Built Design System → 87% Component Coverage: Design Sys Bullets
Free · No signup · Recruiter-reviewed
Replaced three soft nouns ('consistency', 'velocity', 'product teams') with the three defensible facts: component count, surface-coverage %, and the build-time delta — the only outcome a design-system VP signs off on.
Shipped 84 production components across 6 product teams, hitting 87% surface coverage and cutting average new-page build time from 9 days to 3.5.
What changed and why
- Component count, surface coverage %, adoption rate, build-time delta — these are the four design-system metrics that prove platform value.
- Coverage % is the hardest single number to fake — quote it.
- Build-time delta (9 days → 3.5) is the metric that proves the system reached engineers, not just sat in Figma.
- Team count adopting (6) > 'multiple teams' — the AI shortcut never picks an exact number.
Recruiter perspective
“84 components shipped, 87% coverage, build-time halved. That's a platform-designer profile.”
Related rewrites
Designed Checkout → +14% Conversion: Product Designer Bullets
Replaced two soft phrases ('user-friendly', 'collaborated closely') with the surface (checkout), the structural move (4→2 steps), and the only number a recruiter cares about (conversion lift, with sample size).
Conducted User Research → Killed a £400k Bet: UXR Bullets
Replaced two passive nouns ('research', 'decisions') with the study mix (generative + unmoderated), the sample size, and the only outcome that proves UXR value: a decision changed BEFORE engineering spent the money.
Created Visual Identity → Shipped 240 Assets: Brand Designer Bullets
Brand-design bullets default to 'creative quality' — unverifiable. The rewrite trades polish-language for three defensible numbers: asset count, surface count, and adoption-team count within a specific time window.